VERDICT
ON
QADIYANIS
A
Logical Approach
(SPECIAL
PRESENTATION FOR THE YOUNG MEN OF TODAY)
By:
MAULANA MUHAMMAD YUSUF
LUDHIANVI
CONTENTS
Foreword
PART
I
Mirza
qadiyani in Allah’s Court
Case
No. 1
Case
No. 2
Case
No. 3
Case
No. 4
Case
No. 5
PART
II
Some
Predictions of mirza that came true
Prediction
No. 1
Prediction
No. 2
Prediction
No. 3
Prediction
No. 4
Prediction
No. 5
Prediction
No. 6
Prediction
No. 7
PART
III
Some
Invocations of mirza which were accepted
in Allah’s audience
Invocation
No. 1
Invocation
No. 2
Invocation
No. 3
PART
IV
Who
is promised Masih
Proof
No. 1 — mirza is not the promised Masih
Proof
No. 2 — mirza qadiyani did not come in the Last Era
Proof
No. 3 — Masih Ibn Mariam shall live for forty years in the world
Proof
No. 4 — Masih Ibn Mariam shall marry appendices
Summary
of References
Photocopies
of References
FOREWORD
The Ulema of the Ummah have discussed
every aspect of mirza ghulam ahmed qadiyani with great thoroughness in the
light of Quran Kareem and Ahadith Mubarakah and have left none untouched. On my
part, this humble self has also tried to do his bit with some writings but it
struck me that I should put forth a write-up for the young men of today in a
form that is concise and direct, and also contains point-by-point approach.
Therefore, this writing is my heartfelt response in that context. If the young
generation of today understands what I want to tell them, then all doubts shall
be clear to them and they would easily identify mirza ghulam qadiyani as a liar
and knave.
In the Appendix, photocopies of
relevant pages of the books which have been quoted in this write-up have been
annexed including a summary of all the References with their page numbers.
I implore Allah to forgive me for any
slip-up in the presentation of this treatise, in its words or description or
intent and grant it acceptance as means of His pleasure for me and guidance for
the faithful. Ameen. He is Omnipotent.
Muhammad Yusuf
Ludhianvi
20.1.13 AH
22.7.92 AD
PART
1
MIRZA
QADIYANI IN ALLAH’S COURT
Respected
Readers: When two parties to a dispute approach Allah
for His Decision and beg of Him for His verdict, this is called Mubahala, and
the result coming out after the Mubahala initiation is considered Allah’s
Decision. mirza qadiyani presented his cases in Allah’s Court, several times,
but Divine Decision went against him each time. Here are some specific cases.
Case
No. 1: Mirza referred a dispute between himself and a
Christian Padre, Atham, in the Court of Allah unilaterally. The Decision went
against him and, seeing his defeat, he resorted to giving interpretations to
Allah’s Decision, twisting the same in his favour.
Case
No. 2: Mirza implored Allah to decide in a dispute he
had picked up against Maulana Sanaullah Amritsari. Allah’s Decision went
against him here too. Details of both these cases will follow shortly.
Case
No. 3: Maulana Abdul Haq Ghaznavi met mirza qadiyani,
face to face, in a Mubahala in the Eidgah of Amritsar on Zeeqadah 10, 1310 AH.
In this case, both parties begged Allah to send His Verdict to identify the
liar from the truthful (Majmua-e-Ishtiharat, Vol. 1, 426-427). 154. Ref.
no.1 In this Mubahala, mirza himself set out a premise that Divine
Decision results in the death of the liar. He said: “The party who is telling
lies dies in the lifetime of the truthful.”
(Malfoozat,
Vol. 9, pp. 440-441).Ref. No. 2.
Result:
Mirza died earlier on May 26, 1908. What he enunciated stood because Maulana
Abdul Haq died nine years later, on May 16,1917. (raees-e-qadiyan, Vol:
2, p.192; tarikh-e-mirza, p.38).Ref. no 3. In this way
Case
No. 4: In this case, a high-ranking disciple of mirza
qadiyani, by name Hafiz Muhammad Yusuf, challenged the above-mentioned Maulana
Abdul Haq Ghaznavi for a Mubahala rendezvous on Shawwal 12, 1310 AH. (April 19,
1893). The issue at stake was whether mirza ghulam ahmed and his two dotards
Hakeem Nooruddin and Muhammad Ahsan Amrohi were Muslims or not. Hafiz Yusuf
said all the three were Muslims but Maulana said they were liars, deceivers and
apostates. No sooner had mirza heard that the said Mubahala was going to be
held than he was filled with extreme joy. He confirmed the action of his
disciple and praised him for his righteousness. Assuming full responsibility in
this connection, mirza took him under his benevolent wings. (Majmua-e-Ishtiharat,
Vol.pp.395-396). Ref. No. 4. But the result was that Hafiz Yusuf lost
because, at the last moment, better sense prevailed on him. He realised his
grave mistake which was leading him to perdition. He offered solemn repentance
to Allah for his “kufr” and the same Hafiz, who was uptill now an
erstwhile defender of mirza, tore open all the seams of qadiyanism. Never was
mirza more disturbed. The result could not be worse for him. Staggering under
this unforeseen blow, he paled with anguish. Collecting himself up, mirza wrote
a dirge in his book, “Arbaeen”, lamenting at this turncoat Hafiz, in
these words:
“Nothing comes
to reason or imagination as to what appended to Hafiz Sahib. What advantage
accrues to a man if he sacrifices his spiritual life for the sake of bodily
life. Personally, I had heard many times form Hafiz Sahib that he was one of
those who affirmed my credibility and was always ready to hold Mubahala against
my accusers. His life had largely passed in this way and he had been narrating
his dreams to me in my support and had held Mubahala with some of my
dissenters.”
(Arbaeen
No. 3, p.21; Roohani Khazain Vol. 17, p.408). Ref. No. 5.
So, this was Allah’s Decision, which
confirmed again that mirza was a Dajjal, Liar and arch-deceiver.
Case No. 5: Mirza
invited Hindu Aryas for a Mubahala and himself said those exact words which he
wanted them to utter at the time of Mubahala. He also proposed that after the
Mubahala:
“There shall
be a waiting period of one year for the Divine Decision to come down. If after
the passage of one year, Divine Punishment falls on the writer of this pamphlet
and not on the adversary, then this humble self, in either case, shall suffer a
fine of Rs.500/- which subject to mutual agreement, shall be deposited into the
government treasury or wherever this amount is easily available to the
adversary. In case he overcomes us he shall entitle himself to collect this sum
automatically but if we overcome him we don’t lay a wager. Our bet is the same
prayer, that is, of heavenly signs befalling, and that’s enough. Now, we
conclude this pamphlet after writing down the subject matter of each of the two
documents of Mubahala”.
(Surma-e-Chasm-e-Arya,
p. 251; Roohani Khazain, Vol. 2, p.301).Ref. No. 6.
If these writings are put together, one
will note that:
(1) Mirza challenged all Aryas to a Mubahala.
(2) His curse would show its effect in a year’s
time.
(3) If in one year’s time nothing untoward
happened to his rival and Divine fury fell on mirza, he should be proved a liar
in both the cases.
(4) When mirza is proved a liar (as stipulated
above), he would pay a fine of Rs.500/- to his adversary and this money he
offered to deposit in advance. In case the adversary lost, then mirza would not
ask for any money because heavenly ill-omens would suffice to strike him down,
as a result of mirza’s curses.
Pandit Lekh Ram, on behalf of Aryas,
accepted the challenge which mirza confirmed in his book, Haqiqat - ul Wahi,
in these words:
“May it be
known that at the end of my book, Surma-e-Chasham-e-Arya, I had called
some Arya people for a Mubahala ............. As a result of my writing. Pandit
Lekh Ram, in his pamphlet, Khabt-e-Ahmediya, which he published in
1888......... held a Mubahala with me. (He closed his writing with the
following prayer). ‘O Parmeshwar (God) make decision between us truly because
never can a liar glorify in Thy Audience against the truthful’.”
(Roohani
Khazain, Vol.22, pp.326-332).Ref. No. 7.
Result:
The challenge was thrown early in 1888. By the end of 1888, the result was to
be out in the form of some Divine Punishment on the Pandit, because mirza had
postulated it but nothing happened and the year of 1888 passed away normally.
Pandit Lekh Ram lived much beyond 1889. Actually he died in 1897 and mirza did
not pay him Rs.500/-. In this way, Lekh Ram won the Mubahala and mirza was proved
a liar once again.
Conclusion:
Respected readers must have noted from the above details
that mirza qadiyani’s case was presented before the Court of Allah five times,
thrice against the Muslims, once against a Christian Padre and once against a
Hindu Arya and, in each of the five cases, Allah’s verdict went against him,
declaring him a liar. Can any wise person even now doubt mirza’s duplicity,
deceit and falsehood?
PART
2
SOME
PREDICTIONS OF MIRZA THAT CAME TRUE
Prediction
No. 1
Mirza in his communication to Maulana
Sanaullah Amritsari wrote:
“In your
paper, you build up this reputation for me that this person imputes falsely, is
a liar and is an arch-impostor. I have borne a lot of tortures from you yet
endured them patiently .... If I am really a liar, an impostor and a charlatan,
as you remember me in your paper, then I will perish in your lifetime”.
(Majmua-e-Ishtiharat
Vol.3, p.578).Ref. No. 8.
Result:
Very right. mirza died on May 26, 1908; Maulana in 1949. Mirza had said: If I
am a liar, an impostor and a charlatan then I will perish in your lifetime. Proved:
Mirza was a liar.
Prediction
No. 2
In the same communication, mirza wrote
to Maulana Sahib:
“If that
punishment which is not in the hands of a human being but only in God’s Hands, such
as plague, cholera, etc., and similar fatal diseases, and if the same do not
descend upon you in my lifetime then I am not God-sent.”
Result:
Very right. mirza died of cholera and Maulana lived on safe and sound long
afterwards.
Proved:
Mirza was “not God-sent.”
(Hayat-e-Nasir,
p. 14, Ref: qadiyani Mazhab, Section), No.80, Ref. No. 9.
Prediction
No. 3
For fifteen days mirza carried on
arguments with a Christian Padre, named Abdullah Atham, head of a local
episcopal diocese. On the last date, June 5, 1893, mirza predicted that within
fifteen months, his adversary would be thrown into ‘Haviya’ (lower reaches of
Hell). Mirza wrote in this respect:
“I admit right
this time that if this prediction goes false, that is, if fifteen months from
this date, the party who is on falsehood in view of Allah, does not fall into
‘Havia’, as death punishment, then I am prepared to undergo every kind of
punishment: disgrace me, blacken my face, collar a rope around my neck or hang
me on the gallows; I am ready for all. I swear by the greatness of Allah’s
Glory that he will certainly do the same, will certainly do the same, will
certainly do the same. Earth and sky may deviate but not His Ordainment. If I
am a liar, keep the gallows ready for me and consider me the most accursed of
all the accursed persons, evil-doers and Satans.
(Jang-e-Muqaddas, pp.210-211; Roohani Khazain,
Vol.6, pp.292-293). Ref. No. 10.)
Result:
Mirza’s divination expired on September 5, 1894, but Atham did not die till
that date. Therefore, this prediction of mirza qadiyani came true that:
“If within
fifteen months, Atham does not fall into Haviya then I am a liar, keep the
gallows ready for me and consider me the most accursed of all the accursed
persons, evil-doers and Satans.”
Prediction
No. 4
Mirza claimed that he had received
Divine Revelation that the husband of Muhammadi Begum (daughter of ahmed Baig
of Hoshiarpur) would die in his lifetime and after that the widow, Muhammadi
Begum, would be married to mirza. In this connection, mirza foretold in these
words:
“I say again
and again that quintessence of my prediction in case of the son-in-law of ahmed
baig shall be his inevitable destiny. Wait for it. If I am a liar then this
prediction will not be fulfilled and my death will come.”
(Anjam-e-Atham
Hashiah p.31).Ref. No. 11.
Result:
The son-in-law of ahmed baig (Sultan Muhammad) did not die during mirza’s
lifetime but mirza died; while Sultan Muhammad lived on for a long time after
mirza’s death. Hence mirza’s prediction came true: “If I am a liar, the
son-in-law of ahmed baig will not die in my lifetime”.
Prediction
No. 5
As a corollary to prediction No.4,
mirza wrote:
“Remember; if
the second part of this prediction does not come true (i.e., son-in-law of
ahmed baig does not die in mirza’s lifetime) then I shall be more wicked than
every wicked man.”
(Zamimah
Anjam-e-Atham, p.54).Ref. No. 12.
Result:
This “divination” also came true word for word. Therefore, consider mirza “more
wicked than every wicked man.”
Prediction
No. 6
Mirza foretold of an impending earth
quake which he said should be a sample of the one to occur at the Resurrection
time. He named it ‘Tremor of the Hour,’ that is. Doomsday shake-up. He
published many notifications for this and in one of them he wrote:
“My
foretelling of the coming earthquake is no ordinary prediction. If that turns
out to be something ordinary or does not come to pass during my lifetime then I
am not God-sent.”
(zamimah braheen-e-ahmediya, Part
5, pp.92-93;
Roohani Khazain, Vol.21, p.253). Ref. No. 13.
Result:
Mirza’s ‘Braheen-e-ahmediya’ Part 5, was published posthumously on Oct.
15,1908, about five months after his death. No such earthquake occurred in his
life and therefore his prediction turned out true, word by word, viz.,
“If the
earthquake did not come to pass during my lifetime then I am not God-sent.”
Point of Interest: In those
days, when mirza was issuing out his posters, one after another, announcing
“Doomsday earthquake” was about to come, there was a gentleman, by name Mulla
Muhammad Bux Hanafi, who refuted it point-blank, saying: “I have come to know
through a resplendent disclosure that no such earthquake will come,” and that
“mirza shall face disgrace in this prediction, as always in the past.” On May
11, 1905, mirza issued another notification in which he quoted from Mulla
Muhammad Bux Hanafi’s rebuttal: .
“I (Mulla
Muhammad Bux Hanafi) firmly announce and proclaim, today, the 6th of May, 1905,
and thereby console all those whose hearts may be awe-stricken or whose spirits
are dampened after hearing what the qadiyani has advertised in Newspapers and
his Posters on April 5, 8, 21, 29, 1905, that a most severe earthquake will
occur and which shall be of such a magnitude and so horrible that no ear would
have ever heard of it nor any eye would have seen it. The qadiyani (also
claiming Hindu godship of)
Mullah
Muhammad Bux Hanafi, Secretary, Anjuman Haami-e-Islam, Lahore.
(Majmua-e-Ishtiharat
mirza qadiyani,Vol.3,
pp.541-542).Ref.
no. 14
Respected Readers! You see the
divination of a genuine Muslim and what came out from the mouth of a spurious
one. Compare what the Musalman said and what the kafir said. By virtue of glory
of Hazrat Khatam-un-Nabieen Hazrat (
) Allah corroborated the truthfulness of the
Muslim while mirza qadiyani fell into disgrace by saying: “If that (earthquake)
does not come to pass during my lifetime then I am not God-sent.”
Proved:
mirza, a liar.
Prediction
No. 7
Mirza qadiyani wrote a letter to Qazi
Nazar Hussain, Editor of Qul Qul, Bijnore, India. It was published in
the qadiyani newspaper, Badr, dated 19th July, 1906. Its extract is
given below:
“My work for
which I am standing in this ground is none other than that I will shatter the
pillar of ‘Isa-worship’ (i.e. Jusus-worship) and will spread monotheism instead
of Trinity and exhibit the eminence and dignity of the holy Prophet (swa) to the world. Hence, if even crores
of signs may appear from me but this real work does not come to pass through
me, then I am a liar. Therefore, why is the world hostile to me and why does it
not see my accomplishments? If I succeed in doing that work in Islam’s support
which ought to be done by the promised Masih and the promised Mahdi, then I am
truthful and if nothing is achieved and I am dead, then let all be witness that
I am a liar.”
(Akhbar
Badr, qadiyan Number, Vol.29, p.4, dated July 2-19, 1906;
qadiyani mazhab Section 7, No.39)
Ref. No. 15
Mirza’s prediction came true. He died
and nothing was achieved. The world saw the finale of this fake sire.
Eighty-five years have passed since his death and “the pillar of Isa-worship”
has not yet crumbled; faith in Trinity has not yielded to monotheism; and
Christianity has seen no impediments; only mirza’s loquacity has gone bottom-side
up! His ravings only helped to spiral a greater ascendency for the Christians.
In consequence
the world must go on calling mirza, as he wished to be called, a liar, a liar,
a liar till his Day of Reckoning!
PART
3
SOME
INVOCATIONS OF MIRZA
WHICH
WERE ACCEPTED IN ALLAH’S AUDIENCE
Invocation
No.l
In his published notification dated
October 27, 1894, mirza wrote:
“In the end I
beseech you, 0 God Almighty, All-knowing, if these predictions of mine, that
Atham shall be drawn into fatal tortures and that ahmed baig’s elder daughter
shall ultimately come into Nikah of this humble self, are from Your side then
reveal them in such a manner that it becomes a conclusive proof for the mankind
and shuts the mouth of the inwardly blind envious people. And 0 God, if these
predictions are not from Thine side then perish me with disgrace because I
failed to attain my objective. Therefore, if in Your View, I am a driven
outcast, accursed charlatan and one-eyed anti-Christ impostor, as my opponents
have thought of me and that Benevolence of Yours is not with me which was with
Your servant Ibrahim, and with Ishaq, and with Ismail, and with Yaqoob, and
with Moosa and with Dawood, and with Masih bin Mariam, and with () the best of all prophets and with the eminent
saints of the Ummah, then efface me and annihilate me contemptuously making me
a target of never ending imprecations, curses, and make all my enemies happy
and accept their prayers.”
(Majmua-e-lshtiharat:
Vol. 2, pp. 115-116). Ref. no. 16.
Result:
Despite these heartrending entreaties and self-accursements, Allah did keep
mirza deprived of Nikah with Muhammadi Begum, ahmed baig’s elder daughter,
until mirza breathed his last; nor was Atham drawn into fatal tortures. This
proves that these predictions were not from Allah’s side and therefore mirza’s
prayer was accepted that “if these predictions are not from Your Side then
perish me with disgrace.” Therefore according to his own statement, mirza was
“a driven outcast, accursed charlatan and one-eyed anti-Christ impostor,” and
“a target of never ending imprecations, and curses.”
Invocation
No. 2
In his poster, “Aakhri
Faisla with Maulvi Sanaullah Amritsari,” mirza wrote:
“I invoke
Allah: 0 my Master, All-seeing, All-Powerful, Who is also All-knowing and
All-Aware and Who is also conscious of spiritual conditions of my heart that if
this claim of promised Masihship is a false imputation from the side of a base
self and if I am in Your Eyes a liar, mischief-monger, imputing false
attributes to my own self, as my day and night routine, then, 0 my dear Master,
I pray to Your Exalted Audience with all possible humility that destroy me in
the lifetime of Maulana Sanaullah and let my death make him and his Jamaat
happy.”
(Majmua-e-Ishtiharat,
Vol.3, pp. 578-579). Ref. No. 8.
Result:
Allah accepted this invocation of mirza also and mirza died in the lifetime of
Maulana Sanaullah, which proved that mirza was “a liar and mischief-monger
imputing false attributes,” and this was his “day and night routine.”
Invocation
No. 3
In this very poster mirza wrote:
“Holding the
garment of Your Sanctity and Mercy, I supplicate in Your Lofty Audience to
bring out true decision between me and Sanaullah and whosoever is really a liar
and mischief-monger in Your Eye, then carry him off from this world in the very
lifetime of the one who is truthful, or involve him in such a severe affliction
as is like death. 0, my dear Master, do in this very manner. Aameen thumma
Aameen.”
“In the end,
my request to Maulana Sahib is that he should print all this writing in his
periodical and may write underneath whatever he wants to write. Now, decision
rests in Allah’s Hands.”
(Ibid.)
Result:
This invocation of mirza was also accepted by Allah, the Exalted, because
exactly after one year and ten days. Mirza went into the grave and Maulana saw
him go.
Proved:
Mirza was an impostor and arch-liar in the Eyes of Allah. Maulana lived full
forty-one years after mirza.
Further Proof: In malfoozat-e-mirza,
Vol. 9, p.268, Mirza said:
“These are
amazing wonders of times. When we go to sleep there is not a thought
whatsoever, till suddenly there occurs a revelation, which is accomplished on
its time only. No week or ten-days go blank without some Divine token. What has
been written about Sanaullah, actually that is not from our side, but from
Allah’s side its groundwork has originated. Once, our attention had turned
towards it and when at night the attention was towards that end, a revelation
dawned in the night that: “I answer the call of a caller”. For saints, it is in
the acceptance of invocations that supernatural excellence lies. The rest are
its off-shoots”
(Malfoozat,Vol.9,
p.268).Ref. No. 17.
PART
4
MIRZA
QADIYANI AND PROMISED MASIH
Who
is promised Masih ?
He is Masih Ibn Mariam about whom it
has been pledged to the Ummah that he would come into the world in its last
era.
Thus, mirza qadiyani writes:
“This is not a
hidden matter that the prediction for Masih Ibn Mariam coming again is a
prediction of the first grade that has been acknowledged by everybody,
unanimously. Out of all the divinations, recorded in books of Traditions, this
one is proved to be matchless. Among the ‘Tawatur’ Category, first place is
occupied by it. Injil (Gospel) also confirms this”.
(Izala-e-Auham,
p.557; Khazain, Vol.3, p.400). Ref. No. 18.
Proof
No. 1: mirza is vfit the promised Masih
Mirza himself wrote that, “Neither I am
the promised Masih, nor Masih Ibn Mariam; therefore, he who calls me ‘Promised
Masih’, lacks intellect and one who calls me Masih Ibn Mariam is a knave and a
first class liar”
Says mirza:
“Humble
solicitation before learned men of India. 0 brethren-in-faith, and theologians
of inviolable religious law: Listen, you people, my submissions attentively.
The claim of ‘Maseel-e-Masih’, (Likeness of Masih ) which this humble self has
made, has been misunderstood by some erratic people as the “Promised Masih”.
Maseel-e-Masih claim is not a new claim that you are listening today from my
mouth, but it is the same previous Revelation which I received from Allah, the
Exalted, and which I wrote very specifically at several places in braheen
ahmediya after whose publication more than some seven years should have
elapsed by now. Certainly I have not made this claim that I am Masih Ibn
Mariam. Any person who blames me for this is an outright liar and a false
accuser because continuously for the past seven, eight years I have been
notifying that I am ‘Maseel-e-Masih”.
(Izala-e-Auham,
p. 190:Roohani Khazain, Vol.3, p.l92).Ref. No. 19.
Result:
The outcome of the above two statements of mirza is crystal clear, viz.
(a) because the Masih whose coming has
been promised is Masih Ibn Mariam, and
(b) because mirza has not claimed to be
Masih Ibn Mariam;
therefore, mirza qadiyani is not the
promised Masih. On the contrary whosoever calls him Masih Ibn Mariam or the
promised Masih is an outright liar and false accuser.
Proof
No. 2: Mirza qadiyani did not come in the Last Era
Hazrat Masih Ibn Mariam, peace be on
him, will come in the last era of the world and will be the revivalist of the
last century. Acknowledging this fact, mirza quotes a holy Hadith:
“On the head
of each century. God will commission a person who will revive His Deen for the
Ummah.................And any variation in the utterance of (swa) is impossible ... and this is a
unanimous point among Ahle-Sunnat that
the last revivalist of the Ummah shall be the promised Masih who will appear in
the last era. Now the issue that needs to be ascertained is whether the present
time is the last era or not? Both the Jewish and Christian communities agree
that this is the last era. Ask them if you wish”.
(Haqiqat
ul Wahi, p.193; Roohani Khazain, Vol.22, pp.200-201). Ref. No. 2O.
Respected Readers:
Mirza has said here three things: (1) Holy Hadith has it that at the start of
each century a revivalist will come and that it is impossible that a century
starts and the Revivalist does not come, (2) Consensus of Ahle Sunnat is that
the last revivalist of the last century will be Hazrat Masih Ibn Mariam,
Allah’s mercy on him and (3) Agreeing with the Jews and the Christians, mirza
says that the fourteenth century (AH) is the last era of the world.
But with the advent of the fifteenth
century (AH) the third point of mirza is contradicted and is void because as
per prophetic revelation, a revivalist must come in the fifteenth century; and
when the sixteenth century starts a revivalist will again come and so on, till
in the last century, the last revivalist will be Masih Ibn Mariam. This proves
that mirza’s claim in the fourteenth century that he is the promised Masih is
false. Mirza proved to be a liar in his contention.
Proof
No. 3: Masih Ibn Mariam shall live for forty years in the world
“It is in the
Hadith that Hazrat Masih, peace be on him, shall live in the world for forty
years”.
(Ref:
Haqiqat-un- Nubuwwah, p.192, Author:
mirza mahmud ahmed, son of mirza ghulam
ahmed).Ref. No. 21.
Mirza ghulam qadiyani in his book, Nishan-e-Aasmani,
quoted a couplet from Shah Niamat Ullah Wali and conveniently fitted its
contents upon himself:
“Till forty years, 0 brother
mine,
Era of that Cavalier I see”.
“From that
day, the Imam (here mirza calls himself Imam; in the couplet he calls himself
Cavalier) will reveal his self, as one who is divinely inspired. He will have a
life of forty years thereafter. Now let it be clear that this humble has been
commissioned for preaching the truth by special revelation in fortieth year of
his life and has been given a good news that “Thine age is up to eighty years
or thereabout”. Therefore, by this revelation, my preaching commission is
proved to last 40 years, out of which full ten years have already passed”.
(Nishan-e-Aasmani,
p. 14; Roohani Khazain Vol. 4, p.374). Ref. No. 22.
Respected Readers:
Mirza wrote this booklet, Nishan-e-Aasmani, in June,1892, as is written
on its title page. mirza acknowledged that 10 years had already passed and 30
more years remained for him to live (to complete the forty-year Commission of
the promised Masih). In other words, mirza should have lived up to the year
1922, but mirza died in 1908. So his claim of being promised Masih was a lie
and his revelation of living for the said forty years was a hoax.
Proof
No. 4: Masih Ibne Mariam,
Allah’s
Mercy on him, shall marry.
Hadith Shareef has it that Masih Ibn
Mariam, Allah’s mercy on him, shall marry. (Ref. Mishkat, p.480). mirza
qadiyani while mentioning the above Hadith in his book, Nishan-e-Aasmani,
writes:
“For
corroboration of this prediction (Viz., mirza’s illusory, ‘heavenly Nikah’ with
Muhammadi Begum), the holy Prophet of Allah has also previously predicted that
the promised Masih will take a wife and have children. Now it is obvious that
this mention of marriage and children normally bears no significance because
every one generally marries and has children. There is no excellence in it. But
here marriage means special marriage as a token and by children is meant
special children for which the prediction of this humble self is there. It
looks as if the Prophet of Allah (swa) is
answering here the doubts of those black-hearted unbelievers that these sayings
will certainly be fulfilled”.
(Zamimah
Anjam-e-Atham, p.53;
Roohani Khazain
Vol.11, p.337).
Ref. No. 23.
Mirza wrote this in 1896. By that year,
mirza had married twice and had children from them but those were according to
mirza ordinary marriages, which had no excellence. The one that had to be
excellent as a token and which was predicted by the Prophet (swa) never took place. Thus it is proved
that according to the noble saying of the holy Prophet (swa) mirza ghulam ahmed qadiyani was not
the promised Masih.
APPENDICES SUMMARY OF REFERENCES
Ref. No. 1: Majmua-e-Ishtiharat
Vol. 1. pp.426-427.
Ref No. 2: Malfoozat,
Vol 9, pp.440-441.
Ref No. 3: Raees-e-qadiyan.
Vol. 2. p. 192. tarikh-e-mirza p.38.
Ref. No. 4: Majmua-e-Ishtiharat,
Vol. 1. pp.395-396.
Ref. No. 5: Arbaeen
No. 3, p.21. Roohani Khazain. Vol. 17.p.408.
Ref. No. 6: Surma-e-Chashm-e-Arya,p.251;
Roohani Khazain, Vol 2. p.301.
Ref. No. 7: Roohani
Khazain, Vol 22, pp.326-332.
Ref. No. 8: Majmua-e-lshtiharat,
VoL 3. p.578-579.
Ref. No. 9: Hayat-e-Nasir,
p.l4. Ref. qadiyani Mazhab Section 1, No. 80.
Ref. No. 10: Jang-e-Muqaddas,
pp.210-211; Roohani Khazain, Vol 6.pp.292-293.
Ref. No.11: Anjam-e-Atham
(Hashiah), p.31.
Ref. No. 12: Zamimah
Anjam-e-Atham. p.54.
Ref. No. 13: Zamimah
Braheen-e-Ahmedia, Part 5. pp.92-93, Roohani Khazain. Vol
21. p.253.
Ref. No. 14: Majmua-e-Ishtiharat,
Vol 3. pp.541-542.
Ref. No. 15: Akhbar
Badr. qadiyan No. Vol 29. 2-19 July. 1906. p.4; Ref. qadiyani
Mazhab. Section 7, No. 39.
Ref. No. 16: Majmua-e-Ishtiharut.
Vol 2, pp.115-116. Ref. No. 17: Malfoozat Vol 9. p.268.
Ref. No. 18: Izala-e-Auham,
p.557; Roohani Khazain, Vol 3, p.400.
Ref. No. 19: Izala-e-Auham,
p. 190, Roohani Khazain. Vol.3, p.192.
Ref. No.20: Haqiqat-ul-Wahi.
p. 193: Roohani Khazain, Vol22.pp.200-201.
Ref. No.21: Haqiqat-un-Nubuwwah,
p.192. by mirza mahmud Ahmed.
Ref. No.22: Nishan-e-Aasmani,
p.l4; Roohani Khazain, Vol 4.p.374.
Ref. No.23: Zamimah
Anjam-e-Atham. p.53; Roohani Khazain, Vol 11, p.337.